- Kunle Remi discusses what makes a film cinema-worthy, emphasizing that many filmmakers and audiences confuse TV-quality films with true cinematic works.
- High-quality productions, like those of Kunle Afolayan, exemplify what cinema should be.
- Emerging filmmakers should view criticism as a learning tool rather than a personal attack.
- Quick turnaround times often compromise the quality of films, making them unworthy of cinema.
- Remi encourages filmmakers to learn and grow from their experiences, regardless of initial setbacks.
Nigerian actor Kunle Remi recently spoke out about the current state of filmmaking in Nigeria, emphasizing a crucial distinction between films made for cinema and those intended for television.
During an interview with Hip TV, Remi highlighted the confusion surrounding what constitutes a truly cinematic experience, a confusion prevalent amongst both filmmakers and audiences.
Quick Facts
| Attribute | Details |
| Name | Kunle Remi |
| Birth Year | 1988 |
| Nationality | Nigerian |
| Career Start | 2010 (after winning Gulder Ultimate Search) |
| Notable Works | Ijakumo, Falling, A Naija Christmas |
| Profession | Actor, Filmmaker |
The Cinematic Experience
Remi argued that many films, particularly those with low budgets, are mistakenly labeled as “cinematic.” This, he believes, stems from a general misunderstanding of what cinema truly entails. He stated,
“Not everybody understands what cinema is,”
highlighting a broader industry-wide issue. This misclassification, he warned, leads to viewers expecting a cinematic experience and being disappointed by films that fall short of those standards.
Ultimately, he believes that a clear understanding of the differences between cinematic films and television productions is crucial for both filmmakers and audiences.
See Also | Wizkid Reveals Why He Doesn’t Flaunt Success Online
Quality Over Quantity
Remi used the renowned Nollywood director Kunle Afolayan as an example, praising his ability to consistently create high-quality cinematic works. He noted that Afolayan’s films exhibit a level of craftsmanship that sets them apart from typical television productions.
Remi suggested that if Afolayan were to direct TV films, he might not achieve the same level of success, as his training and focus are geared towards cinema. This distinction underscores the importance of prioritizing quality in filmmaking, a quality that is often sacrificed for speed and budget constraints.
Constructive Criticism
Remi also addressed the importance of constructive criticism within the film industry. He acknowledged that many emerging filmmakers may feel discouraged by negative feedback, but he emphasized that criticism should be viewed as a learning opportunity. He stated, “I can’t discourage anyone because it might be a starting point for some people.” This perspective encourages budding filmmakers to embrace feedback as a means to improve their craft rather than take offense.
The Rush to Produce
Remi made a humorous yet critical observation regarding the rushed production schedules adopted by some filmmakers. He recounted instances where he was informed that a film was intended for cinemas, only to realize it had been produced in a mere five days. This kind of rushed filmmaking, he argued, often results in a product lacking the depth and quality expected of cinematic releases. He expressed disbelief that such films could be considered worthy of cinema, highlighting the need for a more thoughtful approach to filmmaking.
FAQs
Q. What does Kunle Remi mean by “not every movie is cinema-worthy”?
He means that many films produced, especially low-budget ones, do not meet the quality standards expected of cinematic films.
Q. Why does Remi emphasize the difference between cinematic films and TV films?
He believes that understanding this difference is crucial for both filmmakers and audiences to appreciate the art of cinema properly.
Q. How does Remi view constructive criticism?
He sees it as essential for growth and encourages filmmakers to accept feedback positively.
Q. What example does Remi use to illustrate quality in filmmaking?
He cites Kunle Afolayan as a benchmark for high-quality cinematic productions.
See Also | Twitter Influencer Challenges Jada Pollock’s Third Pregnancy Decision
