Simon Guobadia Refuses $50K Divorce Fee for Porsha Williams

Simon Guobadia Refuses $50K Divorce Fee for Porsha Williams, a star of the reality TV show “Real Housewives of Atlanta” (RHOA), has accused her estranged husband, Simon Guobadia, of attempting to “overburden, annoy, harass, and oppress” her by involving their divorce proceedings with her professional life. This includes demanding access to her communication with RHOA producers, her contract, and financial documents related to her return to the Bravo show.

Porsha argues that her income and employment as a reality TV star are irrelevant to their divorce and that Simon’s actions are an attempt to threaten her reputation, career, and ability to earn income by dragging her employer into their dispute.

Simon Guobadia has requested True Entertainment, LLC, the production company behind RHOA, to sit for a deposition and testify on Porsha’s status and income as a cast member for the years 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025. Additionally, he demanded all communication between Porsha, her representatives, and production regarding RHOA filming, recording, taping, storylines, and subjects involving Porsha and her relationship and divorce with him.

Porsha has fought back against these demands, claiming they were not issued in good faith and are an attempt to inflame an already contentious case. She has asked the judge to dismiss Simon’s request to subpoena True Entertainment, LLC for deposition and to order Simon to pay her attorney fees and all costs related to fighting his motion.

Key Takeaways

• Porsha accuses Simon of trying to involve her professional life with RHOA in their divorce proceedings, arguing it’s irrelevant to their marital issues.
• Simon has requested a deposition from True Entertainment, LLC, seeking information about Porsha’s status and income as a RHOA cast member and her communications with the production company. Porsha opposes this, calling it an attempt to intimidate and harass her.
• The couple’s divorce has escalated into a legal battle, with Porsha demanding Simon pay her attorney fees and all costs related to fighting his motion.

Simon Guobadia Refuses $50K Divorce Fee for Porsha Williams

The divorce proceedings between Porsha Williams and Simon Guobadia have taken a contentious turn, with both parties engaging in legal battles over various aspects of their separation. Porsha Williams, a star of “The Real Housewives of Atlanta” (RHOA), accused Simon Guobadia of attempting to “overburden, annoy, harass, and oppress” her by demanding access to her communication with RHOA producers, including her contract and financial documents related to her return to the Bravo show.

This accusation was part of Porsha’s efforts to prevent Simon from using her employment details as leverage in their divorce proceedings, arguing that her income and employment status as a reality TV star are irrelevant to their prenuptial agreement.

Simon Guobadia, on the other hand, has been accused of trying to drag Porsha’s career into their divorce mess by demanding her communication with RHOA producers, including her contract and financial documents related to her return to the Bravo show. This move was seen as an attempt to threaten Porsha’s reputation, career, and ability to earn income by involving her employer in their dispute.

Simon’s request for True Entertainment, LLC, the production company behind RHOA, to sit for a deposition and testify on Porsha’s status and income as a cast member for 2022, 2023, 2024, and 2025, along with all communication between Porsha, her representatives, and production about RHOA filming, recording, taping, storylines, and subjects involving Porsha and her relationship and divorce with Simon, was met with resistance from Porsha. She argued that Simon’s subpoena was not issued in good faith and was an attempt to inflame an already contentious case.

Also Read: Is Max Domi Related To Tie Domi? Relationship And Family

The Reason Simon Guobadia Refuses $50K Divorce Fee for Porsha Williams

Simon Guobadia has offered $100,000 for ‘credible receipts’ proving he cheated during their marriage, further escalating the tensions between the couple. This offer was made as part of Simon’s defense strategy, indicating his willingness to engage in public disputes to protect his interests during the divorce proceedings.

The legal battle between Porsha Williams and Simon Guobadia has not only involved accusations of career threats and cheating but also financial disputes. Simon’s company was ordered to pay a six-figure judgment over an alleged unpaid bill on a private jet deal, highlighting the financial stakes involved in their divorce.

Despite these challenges, Simon expressed confidence that the matters would be resolved, suggesting that he is prepared to face the legal consequences of his actions.

This divorce case has become a high-profile legal battle, with both parties using aggressive tactics to protect their interests. The involvement of RHOA and the public nature of their dispute have added layers of complexity to their divorce proceedings, making it a significant event in the entertainment industry.

Potential Consequences For Simon’s Company If Fail Pay The Six-Figure Judgment Over The Private Jet Deal

If Simon’s company fails to pay the six-figure judgment over the private jet deal, they could face several potential consequences, primarily revolving around legal sanctions and asset recovery mechanisms. These consequences are rooted in the legal framework designed to ensure compliance with court orders and to deter future misconduct.

Legal Sanctions

• Sanctions for Non-compliance: According to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 37, courts have the authority to impose sanctions on parties that fail to comply with discovery rules or orders. This includes failing to make disclosures or cooperate in discovery, which could be relevant if Simon’s company refuses to pay the judgment. Sanctions can range from orders specifying that certain facts be taken as established, precluding the litigation of certain issues, to dismissal of the action in full or in part, or even entry of a default judgment on some or all claims.
• Contempt of Court: If Simon’s company continues to defy the court’s order to pay the judgment, they could be found in contempt of court. This could lead to additional penalties, including fines, imprisonment, or both. Contempt of court is a serious offense that indicates a disregard for the authority of the court and its orders.

Asset Recovery

• Asset Seizure and Forfeiture: In cases where individuals or entities fail to comply with court orders, including judgments, asset recovery mechanisms can be employed. These mechanisms allow for the seizure and forfeiture of assets that are linked to the debt or judgment. While the specifics of asset recovery can vary significantly depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the assets, the principle remains that assets can be targeted to satisfy a judgment.

• International Enforcement: If Simon’s company operates internationally, the judgment could potentially be enforced in other jurisdictions that recognize and enforce the original court’s decisions. This means that assets located in different countries could be targeted to satisfy the judgment. However, enforcement of judgments across borders can be complex and may require additional legal steps to ensure compliance.

Practical Implications

• Reputation Damage: Beyond the immediate financial consequences, failing to pay a judgment can also lead to significant reputational damage. Businesses and individuals are often judged by their willingness to comply with legal obligations, and a refusal to pay a judgment can harm their standing in the eyes of customers, partners, and the public.

• Legal Costs: Pursuing asset recovery and dealing with legal sanctions can incur substantial legal fees. These costs can add to the financial burden of the judgment and may require additional resources to address.

Simon’s company faces a range of potential consequences if they do not pay the six-figure judgment over the private jet deal, including legal sanctions, contempt of court, asset seizure, and international enforcement efforts. These consequences underscore the importance of complying with court orders and the potential risks of non-compliance.

Don’t Miss | Doja Cat Dazzles at Met Gala in Towel, Ignoring ‘Sleeping Beauties’ Theme