HomeNews"If I say anything, let me d!e" - VDM vows not to...

“If I say anything, let me d!e” – VDM vows not to address House of Representatives members due to Bobrisky’s absence

  • VDM vows not to address House of Representatives members due to Bobrisky’s absence, emphasizing his refusal to testify without Bobrisky present.
  • His statement “If I say anything, let me die” underscores his strong stance on accountability.
  • Allegations involve a N15 million bribe linked to Bobrisky and EFCC officials, raising significant concerns.
  • The incident raises questions about transparency in Nigeria’s legal proceedings, sparking widespread debate.
  • Public reactions vary, highlighting differing perspectives on social media influence and its role in the situation.

Newsypeople – In a recent session of the House of Representatives, social media influencer Martins Otse, popularly known as VeryDarkMan (VDM), made headlines with a bold statement:

“If I say anything, let me die.”

This declaration came during a hearing focused on allegations involving cross-dresser Bobrisky and claims of bribery linked to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). VDM’s refusal to speak in Bobrisky’s absence has sparked discussions across various platforms, highlighting the ongoing drama between these two controversial figures.

VDM vows not to address House of Representatives members due to Bobrisky’s absence
VDM vows not to address House of Representatives members due to Bobrisky’s absence | Image Source: guardian.ng

As VDM stood firm in his position, he drew attention not only to the allegations against Bobrisky but also to the broader implications of their ongoing feud.

VeryDarkMan arrived at the hearing dressed in traditional attire, ready to present evidence regarding Bobrisky’s alleged dealings with EFCC officials. However, upon realizing that Bobrisky was absent, he declared his unwillingness to testify.

His statement resonated with frustration and defiance, emphasizing that he would not proceed without the presence of his counterpart. This refusal led to tensions within the committee, as lawmakers threatened to compel him to testify or face arrest for defying his oath.

VDM’s insistence on Bobrisky’s presence before he would speak raises questions about loyalty and accountability in high-profile cases. He argued that both he and Bobrisky had been invited to provide testimony, and without Bobrisky, the proceedings felt incomplete.

This situation reflects a deeper narrative about the dynamics between influencers and public figures in Nigeria, where personal relationships often intersect with legal matters.

VDM vows not to address House of Representatives members due to Bobrisky’s absence
VDM vows not to address House of Representatives members due to Bobrisky’s absence | Image Source: newsexpressngr.com

The core of this controversy revolves around serious allegations against Bobrisky, primarily that he paid a sum of N15 million to EFCC officials to evade money laundering charges.

VDM claimed that this payment was made during the naira-spraying incident that led to Bobrisky’s six-month imprisonment earlier this year. The influencer also suggested that Bobrisky had secured favorable treatment while serving his sentence, which has prompted investigations by both the EFCC and Nigerian Correctional Service (NCoS) officials.

In a dramatic twist, VDM revealed that he possessed additional evidence related to these claims. He mentioned having an audio recording that purportedly confirms Bobrisky’s involvement in bribery and other illicit activities. This revelation adds another layer of complexity to an already tumultuous situation, as VDM continues to position himself as a whistleblower seeking justice rather than merely engaging in sensationalism.

The ongoing feud has escalated into legal threats from both parties. Bobrisky has initiated legal action against VDM for alleged defamation, seeking N1 billion in damages.

In response, VDM has threatened to counter-sue for an even larger amount, humorously adding N20 to his demand as a form of mockery towards his opponent. This back-and-forth highlights not only the personal animosity between them but also the broader implications for public discourse in Nigeria.

As both parties prepare for potential court battles, their actions raise questions about the ethics of social media influence and the responsibilities that come with it. VDM’s insistence on transparency contrasts sharply with Bobrisky’s legal maneuvers aimed at silencing criticism. The outcome of this conflict could set precedents for how public figures handle allegations and reputational damage in an increasingly digital world.

Also Read: VDM and Lawyer Deji Adeyanju Testify on Bobrisky Bribery Allegations (Video)

Don't miss out!
JOIN OUR NEWSYPEOPLE COMMUNITY!

Our newsletter gives you access to a curated selection of the most important stories daily.

Invalid email address
Eyewitness? Submit your stories now via social or Email: [email protected]
Copyright © 2024 Newsypeople.com All rights reserved. The information contained in Newsypeople.com may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without the prior written authority of Newsypeople.com.
RELATED ARTICLES
- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -

Most Popular

- Advertisment -
- Advertisment -




Verified by MonsterInsights